Why Christians Attack Evolution

[Esquilax]

The principle reason I personally attack the evolutionary nonsense is because it is false.

We have observed it happening in the lab, in nature, and can observe it happening live. Just ask me to show you some examples and I will, though I suspect your inevitable objections to them will showcase how little you understand the theory you've decided is false.

The substitution of one preisthood and view of life for another.

There are plenty of christians who accept the fact of evolution.

The high preisthood of Darwin revels in social power, takes decades to admit their hoaxes - all those bent over, cave- men to men caricatures we saw all those years- were fake.

It's really hard to discuss this without sources; could you point to some hoaxes? As for caricatures, we no longer need them: This is what the lineage of ape-to-human fossils looks like now.

The "Lucy" scam where they substituted straight finger bones for the missing parts the monkey didn't have in their pictorial prints of the bones, while monkey hand bones are curved.

Gotta say, big red flag right here: there is so much wrong with what you just said. First of all, Lucy wasn't a monkey: she's an Australopithecus afarensis, so there's simply no reason to expect that monkey features would carry across. Second of all, there's no scam here; it's a matter of public record that the Lucy skeleton is only about forty percent complete, and this has been known since her discovery. You are simply mistaken here. Moreover, we have more specimens of Australopethicus than just Lucy. I don't know what creationist bilge pump you got this stuff from, but you're so very wrong, here.

They have a huge monetary vested interest in maintaining the money flow. Who are you kidding?

I see, and you don't think that there would be more money in disproving evolution, in so doing turning the entire science of biology on its head and changing over a century of research? That kind of worldview altering discovery made the names of some of the greatest scientists in human history, and you're saying that here it's so very obvious... and yet no scientist, in any culture and of any religious stripe, has opted to publish the peer reviewed findings that would net him or her a Nobel prize at least? That sound reasonable to you?

Not that you actually demonstrated your premise or anything. You just asserted it baselessly.

These guys operate like a herd.

When the smart cows know where the grass is, there's no shame in sticking with them.

Nobody wants to stick their face out and admit the BS.
We are called fairyoligists while you guys, having a similar position get away with it?

Considering your apparent inability to actually present evidence that disproves evolution, I think we're far smarter for sticking with the trained scientists who actually know what they're talking about, don't you?