An unorthodox belief in God.

[Fidel_Castronaut]

The defining characteristic of evidence is that examining it leads to a particular conclusion and if the evidence were different, it would lead to a different conclusion. By claiming absolutely everything as evidence, you rob it all of the property of being evidence: that a different conclusion could be reached if the evidence were different.

PLUS:

If God, then everything->Everything, therefore God

has the same problem as

If Bill Gates, then rich->Rich, therefore Bill Gates.

I wish I felt like posting all the evidence; its just too much; maybe I can use some pages I wrote else where; Let me see if this works.

http://www.forumgarden.com/forums/genera...l-113.html

Okay it worked; not that I am lazy, but consider this page of reasoned evidence; and we can go through each one individually as you wish.
And this is my work. Not someonelse.

You're just saying things and then invoking 'god' in that thread. If I submitted such sloppy 'research' for my phd thesis I'd be laughed out of the building.

My iPad = god

My fiancé = god

My car = god

The Higgs boson = god

These are not evidence of anything aside your own willingness to accept an argument from ignorance and to make bare assertions to that end with confirmation bias.

I mean, it's just utter, utter nonsense, and I'm at a loss as to how anyone can't see that.

I'll give you one thing, though, and that's that you refuse to admit when you're using fallacious reasoning even though every single post you've made on here uses it.

Have you seen this article? I beseech you to read it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance

And this is without going into the fact that there were no contemporary accounts of Jesus' life whatsoever. Indeed, there wasn't anything written about Jesus until all after his supposed death.