(August 5, 2014 at 9:38 pm)Stimbo Wrote:(August 5, 2014 at 9:32 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: Maybe so, but it's still admissible as evidence in any court.
Whether or not that's true, you have to bear in mind that submitting the evidence is just the first step. It goes on to be evaluated and tested. If it's found to be insufficient, or worse, completely erroneous, it gets discarded. That holds whether it's a courtroom context or otherwise.
Also doesn't hold any weight in scientific inquiry too. Recorded observations repeated over a given time period > one eyewitness testimony.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.