RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
November 1, 2014 at 4:24 am
(This post was last modified: November 1, 2014 at 4:29 am by Rob216.)
(November 1, 2014 at 4:05 am)Alex K Wrote:(November 1, 2014 at 4:03 am)Rob216 Wrote: I'm sorry if I made it seem like I was arguing that a self-replicationg molecule needs to be conscious and goal oriented. That's not what I meant. I was simply referring to the origin of that single molecule and how the molecule came into existence in the first place.
I truly don't know, but chance sounds plausible, considering how big the universe is.We already observe that chemistry has the habit of organizing itself in simple self replicating patterns.
Ah I hate when "chance" is brought up as an explanation. To me it has the same annoying affect as saying "this happened because God did it". I know you weren't trying to provoke but that's where my mind goes to when that's brought up. Obviously we don't know everything which is why we have these debates right? lol so yea I'm annoyed that I don't know everything. So that means that I'm not thr chosen one right? lol
(November 1, 2014 at 4:09 am)DarkHorse Wrote:(November 1, 2014 at 3:16 am)Rob216 Wrote: My argument is that Darwin's theory of evolution cannot be true because there has never been scientific proof of any one species adapting over time to be categorized as another species.
Then it must also stand to reason that since there's never been any scientific proof that god exists, he must not exist.
Also, hasn't this topic cropped up a hundred times already?
1. Ok I wasn't arguing that God existed but this wasn't meant to be a religious debate and 2. If you are bored with this topic then why didn't you just ignore it?
