Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 25, 2024, 4:02 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
#40
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false
Louis Pasteur is popularly known as the "father of microbiology". He is responsible for crushing the doctrine of spontaneous generation. He performed experiments that showed that without contamination, microorganisms could not develop. Under the auspices of theFrench Academy of Sciences, he demonstrated that in sterilized and sealed flasks nothing ever developed, and in sterilized but open flasks microorganism could grow.
Research career

Share

Louis Pasteur

Written by Agnes Ullmann

Louis Pasteur,  (born December 27, 1822, Dole, France—died September 28, 1895, Saint-Cloud), French chemist and microbiologist who was one of the most important founders of medical microbiology. Pasteur’s contributions to science,technology, and medicine are nearly without precedent. He pioneered the study of molecular asymmetry; discovered that microorganisms cause fermentation and disease; originated the process ofpasteurization; saved the beer, wine, and silkindustries in France; and developedvaccines against anthrax and rabies.

Pasteur’s academic positions were numerous, and his scientific accomplishments earned him France’s highest decoration, the Legion of Honour, as well as election to the Académie des Sciences and many other distinctions. Today there are some 30 institutes and an impressive number of hospitals, schools, buildings, and streets that bear his name—a set of honours bestowed on few scientists.

Spontaneous generation

Fermentation and putrefaction were often perceived as being spontaneous phenomena, a perception stemming from the ancient belief that life could generate spontaneously. During the 18th century the debate was pursued by the English naturalist and Roman Catholic divine John Turberville Needham and the French naturalist Georges-Louis Leclerc, count de Buffon. While both supported the idea ofspontaneous generation, Italian abbot and physiologist Lazzaro Spallanzani maintained that life could never spontaneously generate from dead matter. In 1859, the year English naturalist Charles Darwin published his On the Origin of Species, Pasteur decided to settle this dispute. He was convinced that his germ theory could not be firmly substantiated as long as belief in spontaneous generation persisted. Pasteur attacked the problem by using a simple experimental procedure. He showed that beef broth could be sterilized by boiling it in a “swan-neck” flask, which has a long bending neck that traps dust particles and other contaminants before they reach the body of the flask. However, if the broth was boiled and the neck of the flask was broken off following boiling, the broth, being reexposed to air, eventually became cloudy, indicating microbial contamination. These experiments proved that there was no spontaneous generation, since the boiled broth, if never reexposed to air, remained sterile. This not only settled the philosophical problem of the origin of life at the time but also placed on solid ground the new science of bacteriology, which relied on proven techniques of sterilization and aseptic manipulation.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topi...is-Pasteur

Lastly, the theory of biogenesis was created by the ancient Greeks (but they didn't coin that term). They believed that living things could spontaneously come into being from nonliving matter, and that the goddess Gaia could make life arise spontaneously from stones – a process known as Generatio spontanea. 


So it has been proven that life can not be created from things that are not already living.
"My life has taught me that true spiritual insight can come about only through direct experience, the way a severe burn can be attained only by putting your hand in the fire. Faith is nothing more than a watered-down attempt to accept someone else's insight as your own." -Damien Echols
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false - by Rob216 - November 2, 2014 at 6:00 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Why do the religious hate evolution? WinterHold 20 2143 February 18, 2019 at 1:09 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Theory of Evolution, Atheism, and Homophobia. RayOfLight 31 5034 October 25, 2017 at 9:24 am
Last Post: Brian37
  Panspermia theory? mediocrates 28 5046 May 24, 2017 at 9:05 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Heated debate on evolution with brother MyelinSheath 182 43993 May 7, 2017 at 8:13 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Test My Theory: Macro evolution DOES happen? Gawdzilla Sama 44 13019 December 20, 2016 at 6:35 pm
Last Post: RoadRunner79
  Giulio Tononi's Theory of Consciousness Jehanne 11 3381 September 18, 2016 at 6:38 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Darwin's Voyage on the Beagle, droll dramatization Alex K 2 847 September 17, 2016 at 9:45 am
Last Post: Alex K
  Why Debate a Teenager? Goosebump 16 3842 April 25, 2016 at 11:10 am
Last Post: Aegon
  The simple body test that proves the theory of evolution TubbyTubby 17 2797 March 22, 2016 at 5:50 am
Last Post: robvalue
  Nature: Does evolutionary theory need a rethink? Dolorian 10 4132 October 12, 2014 at 10:52 am
Last Post: Chas



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)