Scientific Debate: Why I assert that Darwin's theory of evolution is false

[Esquilax]

Evolutionists tell us we cannot see evolution taking place because it happens too slowly. A human generation takes about 20 years from birth to parenthood. They say it took tens of thousands of generations to form man from a common ancestor with the ape, from populations of only hundreds or thousands. We do not have these problems with bacteria. A new generation of bacteria grows in as short as 12 minutes or up to 24 hours or more, depending on the type of bacteria and the environment, but typically 20 minutes to a few hours. There are more bacteria in the world than there are grains of sand on all of the beaches of the world (and many grains of sand are covered with bacteria). They exist in just about any environment: hot, cold, dry, wet, high pressure, low pressure, small groups, large colonies, isolated, much food, little food, much oxygen, no oxygen, in toxic chemicals, etc.

You're right. And do you know that it's been documented under laboratory conditions that a colony of bacteria can evolve the ability to digest nylon, a material that did not exist in any form before 1935?

There is much variation in bacteria. There are many mutations but they never turn into anything new. They always remain bacteria. Fruit flies are much more complex than already complex single-cell bacteria. In the lab, fruit flies are studied under every conceivable condition. There is much variation in fruit flies. There are many mutations. But they never turn into anything new. They always remain fruit flies. Many years of study of countless generations of bacteria and fruit flies all over the world shows that evolution is not happening today.

The problem you're having is in thinking that this is just a matter of generations, that after X number of generations a new species will automatically be generated. This is untrue; the arrival of new species is based on the selection pressures facing a given organism, as well as time. In the case of bacteria and fruit flies, they are well settled into their ecological niches to such a degree that there isn't a requirement for rapid change merely to survive. You can see the same thing, by the way, with sharks; given that they are apex predators, they don't have the same kind of selection pressures that other species have to deal with.

That said, evolution has never just been about the generation of new species. In actuality, evolution is genetic change over successive generations in a population of organisms, which is easily demonstrable, such as in the nylon-digestion example I gave earlier, and many others. The fact that you didn't actually know what evolution was before you saw fit to talk about it speaks volumes about your willingness to approach this topic honestly, and with anything other than your knee-jerk, thoughtless creationist distortions.