RE: Does Atheism have a Generally accepted Symbol (and do we need one?)
December 4, 2014 at 4:25 pm
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2014 at 4:25 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
A symbol isn't generally recognized unless its recognized...by the general group, heh. I just don't see the majority of atheists wanting any specific symbol or logo (or one at all), not to mention the impossiblity of coming to determine if a majority of atheists would want a specific logo or symbol.
It wouldn't be a general symbol if only a portion of a group recognizes it, it would just be another "Brights" or "Atheism +" label that a portion of the group likes, other portions are indifferent towards, and other portions actively dislike. It's not practical, necessary, or useful.
It wouldn't be a general symbol if only a portion of a group recognizes it, it would just be another "Brights" or "Atheism +" label that a portion of the group likes, other portions are indifferent towards, and other portions actively dislike. It's not practical, necessary, or useful.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson