RE: This Asshole Has Fetuses on the Brain.
January 6, 2015 at 6:49 pm
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2015 at 6:50 pm by Dystopia.)
(January 6, 2015 at 6:37 pm)Chas Wrote:1 - Pro-abortion would be supporting abortion as the rational decision a woman should make regarding her own body, contrary to pro-choice activists that simply argue women should have the right to voluntarily and without coercion terminate their own pregnancies if they wish, regardless of everyone's moral or ethical opinion on it since it shouldn't be imposed - Notice the difference? Then please correct your stance Heywood(January 6, 2015 at 5:40 pm)Heywood Wrote: If the objective of an abortion is to end a pregnancy, what then is the reason to be opposed to ending pregnancies in a manner which preserves the life to the child?
I am saying that the reason the pro-abortion movement seems to be against this method of ending pregnancies is because it is part of their goal to not only end an unwanted pregnancy, but also to stop a person they do not want to exist....from existing.
What does that say about the pro-abortion movement?
How many cells constitute a 'child'? One? Two? Four? ...
2 - Even if the fetus was a person, I've already justified why forcing a surgery to remove a fetus on someone violates basic human dignity, but obviously you refuse to accept that - If this technology is developed, the status quo won't change, and your will to control other people's bodies is not important.
[This was meant to answer Heywood but I quoted the last paragraph because even if a fetus was considered a "child" that's irrelevant given the circumstances]
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you