RE: William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.
February 13, 2015 at 2:35 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2015 at 2:36 am by Mudhammam.)
(February 12, 2015 at 9:19 pm)YGninja Wrote: We're dealing with likelihoods here, what is most reasonable. Its true that neither of us know, but we can discuss where the evidence leads - to a beginning of the universe and a necessarily existing prime mover.Even if someone were to grant your cute little exercise in Aristotelian logic as both valid and sound, can you stop throwing "necessarily existing prime mover" around like you have any fucking clue what such a combination of words even mean in actuality?
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza