William Lane Craig continues to desperately defend the indefensible.

[Thumpalumpacus]

So much garbage in YG's head but this really made me laugh out loud:

New combinations of information are created every time a genome is made. Most DNA is junk so there is plenty of opportunity for novel results including the addition of information by making more copies due to some particular change in the offspring's genetic code. What the fuck do you think happens in reproduction? I honestly can't believe how uneducated you are and with so much pride. What a laughingstock the educated believers in your church must think you are. Well, if they even exist.

New combinations aren't adding information, theyre changing existing information. Most DNA is NOT junk, this was debunked years ago.

"ENCODE Project Writes Eulogy for Junk DNA
This week, 30 research papers, including six in Nature and additional papers published online by Science, sound the death knell for the idea that our DNA is mostly littered with useless bases. A decade-long project, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE), has found that 80% of the human genome serves some purpose, biochemically speaking. Beyond defining proteins, the DNA bases highlighted by ENCODE specify landing spots for proteins that influence gene activity, strands of RNA with myriad roles, or simply places where chemical modifications serve to silence stretches of our chromosomes."

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/337/6099/1159.summary

Again it is you guys who are ignorant of the science, and its SO ironic because you all behave like you have dominion over it.

So, 20% of 20,000 - 25,000 coding pairs -- which is anywhere from four to five thousand base pairs -- are available for mutation. Got it, thanks.

That's an awful lot of coding pairs, when you remember that mutations aren't just happening in one person, but millions at a time.