|
The argument of "chance"
|
 (February 21, 2015 at 9:41 pm)Wiggy Wrote: Thats a big statement because all of those who wrote the new testament were killed for their testimony. Citation needed!!!!!!!!! We don't even know much of anything about the authors, especially who they were or how their works were disseminated. We certainly don't have reason to suspect that many of them were killed for their stories.
Find the cure for Fundementia!
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
The argument of "chance" - by xr34p3rx - February 21, 2015 at 12:55 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Pizza - February 21, 2015 at 2:08 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by xr34p3rx - February 21, 2015 at 2:35 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Norman Humann - February 21, 2015 at 4:39 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Tonus - February 21, 2015 at 9:43 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 21, 2015 at 7:05 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by dyresand - February 23, 2015 at 7:49 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Lucanus - February 21, 2015 at 2:42 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 2:43 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Neo-Scholastic - February 21, 2015 at 1:16 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 21, 2015 at 1:19 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Norman Humann - February 21, 2015 at 1:21 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Neo-Scholastic - February 21, 2015 at 1:35 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 21, 2015 at 1:50 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Neo-Scholastic - February 21, 2015 at 2:25 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 21, 2015 at 2:30 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Homeless Nutter - February 21, 2015 at 6:50 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Lucanus - February 21, 2015 at 3:02 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 3:30 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Alex K - February 21, 2015 at 4:20 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 4:42 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Alex K - February 21, 2015 at 5:17 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 5:52 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Dystopia - February 21, 2015 at 11:54 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Pizza - February 21, 2015 at 12:11 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 21, 2015 at 12:11 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 1:21 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Fidel_Castronaut - February 21, 2015 at 1:39 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 3:06 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Tonus - February 21, 2015 at 3:12 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Wiggy - February 21, 2015 at 9:01 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 21, 2015 at 9:37 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by veoli - February 23, 2015 at 9:15 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 23, 2015 at 9:38 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by abaris - February 23, 2015 at 9:41 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Thumpalumpacus - February 23, 2015 at 10:35 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 9:05 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by IATIA - February 21, 2015 at 9:05 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Wiggy - February 21, 2015 at 9:12 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by rexbeccarox - February 21, 2015 at 9:13 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by rexbeccarox - February 22, 2015 at 2:49 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 22, 2015 at 2:52 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 23, 2015 at 6:45 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by IATIA - February 21, 2015 at 9:18 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by xr34p3rx - February 22, 2015 at 12:23 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 22, 2015 at 12:40 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by bennyboy - February 22, 2015 at 2:16 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by JesusHChrist - February 23, 2015 at 12:16 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Norman Humann - February 23, 2015 at 3:22 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Neo-Scholastic - February 22, 2015 at 8:29 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 22, 2015 at 8:44 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by bennyboy - February 22, 2015 at 11:05 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 21, 2015 at 9:21 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Wiggy - February 21, 2015 at 9:41 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 21, 2015 at 9:45 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 21, 2015 at 10:21 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Wiggy - February 23, 2015 at 8:15 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Alex K - February 23, 2015 at 8:23 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 23, 2015 at 11:24 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Pizza - February 23, 2015 at 4:18 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Simon Moon - February 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Tonus - February 21, 2015 at 10:28 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Grandizer - February 21, 2015 at 11:45 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Brakeman - February 22, 2015 at 12:11 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Thumpalumpacus - February 23, 2015 at 6:25 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by rexbeccarox - February 23, 2015 at 6:41 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Thumpalumpacus - February 23, 2015 at 7:36 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by IATIA - February 21, 2015 at 11:51 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by TheRealJoeFish - February 22, 2015 at 12:53 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 22, 2015 at 1:17 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 22, 2015 at 2:51 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Tonus - February 22, 2015 at 8:57 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 22, 2015 at 12:37 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Ravenshire - February 23, 2015 at 11:08 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by dyresand - February 24, 2015 at 12:21 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 23, 2015 at 8:39 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by ManMachine - February 23, 2015 at 8:40 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by robvalue - February 23, 2015 at 8:52 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Fidel_Castronaut - February 23, 2015 at 11:45 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Thumpalumpacus - February 23, 2015 at 5:26 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Valkyrie - February 23, 2015 at 9:20 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by dyresand - February 23, 2015 at 9:33 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by JesusHChrist - February 23, 2015 at 9:49 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Esquilax - February 23, 2015 at 10:19 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Dystopia - February 23, 2015 at 10:56 pm
RE: The argument of "chance" - by Thumpalumpacus - February 24, 2015 at 3:21 am
RE: The argument of "chance" - by The Reality Salesman - February 24, 2015 at 12:40 pm
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| Abiogenesis ("Chemical Evolution"): Did Life come from Non-Life by Pure Chance. | Nishant Xavier | 55 | 3107 |
August 6, 2023 at 5:19 pm Last Post: Thumpalumpacus |
|
| By chance? | Yukon_Jack | 438 | 38299 |
March 8, 2020 at 11:40 pm Last Post: The Architect Of Fate |
|
| A chance to do good without god | Baalzebutt | 8 | 3274 |
February 27, 2013 at 4:26 pm Last Post: Baalzebutt |
|
| Products of Chance | Reasonable_Jeff | 44 | 13602 |
September 26, 2012 at 5:08 pm Last Post: Darkstar |
|
| Logic of chance | Ephrium | 59 | 19986 |
August 27, 2009 at 4:20 pm Last Post: Violet |
|
