(July 24, 2015 at 11:58 am)robvalue Wrote: Indeed. He won't acknowledge the need for others to verify your results. Apparently you just do it on your own and claim victory. I guess I'm just a dumb atheist who dogmatically insists on repeatability.
I'd be interested to hear of one single scientific theory that was not peer reviewed. Theory. Not hypothesis.
Rik thinks there's something called "intuitional science," which he repeatedly insisted is a real thing in the last debacle of a thread he was in, and basically it's just making things up, feeling that they are true... and you're done. Science has happened.
He's desperate to grab up all the credibility he can for his ravings, unwilling to concede that there's more work that needs to be done before you could call that respectable, and arrogantly unable to even consider that he might not be right on every point. He has not a shred of an idea of what science is, and will not accept correction.
You'd be better off talking to a brick wall; the wall won't think it has the right to insult your intelligence for not following his "I thought of this, therefore science" crap.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!