Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Redbeard The Pink]

You can read tons of reports about a specific issue.
You will always find the positive and negative reports and at the end you wouldn't really know the truth.
Years ago i did heal 100% an old man which contracted a disease called MRSA (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus).
His leg was almost eaten by these bugs and the amputation was on the way.
The doctors try and try with mountain of antibiotics to no avail.
The leg got worse and worse.
I knew that the NEEM oil was the only solution.
This ayurveda old remedy has been used for ages and ages in India when the modern medicines were not available.
Within 3 weeks of treatment his leg got better and better and after 5 weeks it heal 100% to the astonish of doctors.
So no, let the skeptics think what they like.
Who care.
I know that they are wrong and that is what matter.  

If you only depend on reports (or even direct experiences) of isolated incidents (aka anecdotal evidence), then sure, you can find evidence for just about any damn thing you could dream up: werewolves, aliens, Slender Man, Bigfoot, Nessie, Moth Man, Chupacabra, chemtrails, the Illuminati...you name it, there's some dumb fuck out there who will insist he's seen it personally and knows everything there is to know about it. This is why science conducts studies with lots of people under strict documentation instead of trying one thing on one guy and declaring the whole thing pseudoscience based on their memory of the event.


As for your little story, I don't believe you. Your claim is unreasonable and remarkably convenient to your argument, so I will need to see some evidence of this healing you allegedly performed in order to believe that it happened. Furthermore, even if you can produce evidence that your friend randomly got better without the doctors being able to explain it, I would still need to see evidence that your snake oil was the causative factor in his recovery and not something else (like maybe he just fought it off under continued batteries of antibiotics during those weeks, for instance). Unless you can produce that stuff, your story can't be taken seriously as evidence of your claims, and even then it would still be anecdotal evidence that would need further study before conclusions could be drawn.


It's just unscientific of you to believe all this stuff.

You can have all the knowledge that you like but deep within there is something that make you feel unhappy.
What you do with all your knowledge then.
Would that help you a tiny bit?
That is why the reality within is paramount and the external reality matter almost nothing.
Philosophy is all about be wise and be wise is all about feeling at peace with yourself within.
All the rest is bullshit.

Actually yes, my knowledge has been a great comfort to me during times of hardship because I know that suffering is impermanent and that circumstances change constantly, and that even if I don't survive my suffering I don't have to spend a painful/boring eternity in Heaven or Hell. I'm actually a lot less stressed and depressed than I used to be when I was religious.

You ask me a question in order to prove that science only started short time ago.
I did show you that this is crap as even in the very old times people were engaged in science.
Turn it as you like.
All you gain is a mental masturbation.  

Again, no, you didn't. You only showed us that you have a minimal understanding of how language works. Again. That's pretty unscientific.

Tantra is pure spirituality but what's the point to make the idea entering your brain when you never practice it?
A waste of time.  

"Christianity isn't a religion, it's a lifestyle."


"Buddhism isn't a religion, it's a philosophy."


"Tantra isn't a religion, it's pure spirituality."


Bullshit. Tantra is a religion. Everyone wants to claim that everyone else's religion is just a religion and that theirs is somehow special, but it never is. Your religion is a religion, fuckface. This is just the "No True Scotsman" fallacy wrapped in a not-so-convincing disguise.


How very unscientific of you.