Atheism the unscientific belief (part one, two, and three)

[Little Rik]

You like to be funny Wind, do you?  
Before i start with few atheists dogmas i start with one of yours.
You say..........We live a life trying to achieve happiness only to die........
By saying this you claim that we die.
Where is the evidence that we die?
Have you got solid evidence that the body is the real you and that the consciousness and the body are one?
I tell you what Wind.
Until you back your claim with solid evidence you should really shut up because a statement not backed up by solid evidence is a dogma.
You see Wind how easy is to demolish a dogma!  
If, on the other hand you would have said...........I think that we may die....then that is not a dogma because you do not state that that is true.
Now let us see few of atheists dogmas.
1) The consciousness is a product of the brain.
2) The consciousness that we got come thanks to previous generations.
3) We only got the physical senses.
4) The universe started with the big bang.

Happy now?  

Not as funny as you, i don't think we could have asked for a more disillusioned member on the forum.(or a better source of entertainment)

Blahhh, blahhhh, and more blahhhhhhhhhhhh.....

Firstly, can you define "solid evidence" since nothing can really be proofed 100%

I am (we all are) and this is solid evidence that we are WE and all the rest is not evidence.
This alone can be proofed 100%.

The examples you posted aren't dogmas, they are theories or hypothesis's (i haven't delved into those topics yet).Since they they have been formed using scientific method and science can never proof everything 100%,

Get real Wind.
Those are statements without an inch of evidence and therefore are dogmas.
Atheists do not say.......I THINK THAT THE CONSCIOUSNESS IS A PRODUCT OF THE BRAIN.
They say..........THE CONSCIOUSNESS IS.......BLAH BLAH BLAH.
Are you so dumb that can't see the difference?  

it fails the first criteria of a dogma which is : a principle or set of principles laid down by an authority as incontrovertibly true.

There is no need for authority.
As far as you confine a statement inside a corral and you prevent anyone to challenge
that statement you automatically create a dogma.