(September 14, 2015 at 1:57 pm)Losty Wrote:(September 14, 2015 at 1:50 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I don't think so. If that was the case, I would be all for the death penalty, but I am not.
And yet you say a person is justified to kill someone in self defense...unless the "person" killing you is a fetus in which case it's no longer justified. I just don't see how you can say all life is equal if you think you can justify taking someone's life but not "someone" else's. It seems like a contradiction to me. Either all lives are equal or you can be justified in taking someone's life in certain circumstances. You cannot be justified in taking someone else's life unless their life has less value than yours. If their life has the same value as everyone else's then why can't all killing be justified?
(JFTR, the reason I don't think it's justified in that case is because the fetus is not an instigator, but rather, he/she is another innocent bi standard.)
Yes, I believe you can be justified in taking someone's life in certain circumstances, but not because their life is worth less than yours. Since it isn't. So yes, killing can be justifiable, but not for the reason that one life is worth more than the other. But rather, because you have the right to defend your own life (or someone else's) against an instigator. Because you have the right to life, if someone else is deliberately trying to take that away, you have the right to do whatever is necessary (but only what is necessary) to stop them.
Perhaps it is your belief that the reason it's justified to kill someone who is trying to kill you, is because their life is worth less. But that is not my reason.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh