(May 10, 2010 at 6:53 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Do you admit that Q3 is flawed?
(Oh and BTW I'm allowed to make jokes. Just because you've had a humour transplant doesn't make sour faces compulsory)
Absolutely not. Question 2 could be read as "So you agree that [at least] some things in the Bible are not literal, like Adam and Eve?", in which case question 3 is still a logical question. Perhaps I over simplified the answers, but A.) the original set of questions also assumed an oversimplified set of responses, and B.) it was partly rhetorical.
I never said you couldn't make jokes - by all means, please do. What I did not appreciate was your insulting responses to an otherwise civil debate. We clearly do not see eye to eye, but I at least granted you the courtesy of not resorting to personal attacks to make my points.
I love friendly debate, but I love to stir the pot and play the devils advocate even more.
----------
"Always demand proof, proof is the elementary courtesy that is anyone's due." - Paul Valéry
----------
Ask me about atheism, vegetarianism, secular parenting, or anything else! http://formspring.me/chrisbloom7
----------
"Always demand proof, proof is the elementary courtesy that is anyone's due." - Paul Valéry
----------
Ask me about atheism, vegetarianism, secular parenting, or anything else! http://formspring.me/chrisbloom7