Sad thought about Jesus.

[popsthebuilder]

God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

1. How do you know that any of those documents to be true and or spiritual. 

2. So you don't use interpretations so you are a literalist then? If you are a literalist there
is a lot of information out there that debunks holy documents. 

3. Personal experience is not evidence and is held up to scrutiny for the lack of evidence. If you were to 
see or experience god you are well hallucinating to some sort of degree. God(s) for the lack of the better word
is just all in your head. 

Not at literalist at all. Never said I saw GOD.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.