Quote:Personal attacks are futile and pointless.

So why mention them?

God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(December 24, 2015 at 10:32 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

1. How do you know that any of those documents to be true and or spiritual. 

2. So you don't use interpretations so you are a literalist then? If you are a literalist there
is a lot of information out there that debunks holy documents. 

3. Personal experience is not evidence and is held up to scrutiny for the lack of evidence. If you were to 
see or experience god you are well hallucinating to some sort of degree. God(s) for the lack of the better word
is just all in your head. 

(December 23, 2015 at 4:28 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: .. He was a man and pure yet subsidiary to the Father or One Creator GOD. Upon resurrection he is no longer man, but spirit. He is the holy spirit, the way, the guide, mercy and the judge among other things.

So do you have conversations with the holy spirit personally? Real conversations, as in he/it actually speaks words to you?

(December 24, 2015 at 10:32 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

No, you are here because someone sold you old books of myth. No human has ever had super powers and all claims of invisible beings are merely wishful thinking. There is no such thing as a magic baby with super natural powers, and there is no such thing as a man having all the blood drained out of his body magically surviving rigor mortis. It was understandable that humans believed those fantastic claims when they didn't know better, but we have a much better understanding of reality than a old bronze age book of myth.

We don't doubt your sincerity in claiming you believe it is true. We do doubt that you understand how notoriously flawed human perceptions can be. Wanting something to be true does not make it true by default.

(December 24, 2015 at 12:52 pm)Brian37 Wrote:

(December 24, 2015 at 10:32 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

No, you are here because someone sold you old books of myth. No human has ever had super powers and all claims of invisible beings are merely wishful thinking. There is no such thing as a magic baby with super natural powers, and there is no such thing as a man having all the blood drained out of his body magically surviving rigor mortis. It was understandable that humans believed those fantastic claims when they didn't know better, but we have a much better understanding of reality than a old bronze age book of myth.

We don't doubt your sincerity in claiming you believe it is true. We do doubt that you understand how notoriously flawed human perceptions can be. Wanting something to be true does not make it true by default.

I wasn't sold on anything and what I know didn't come from ancient scriptures it was simply verified by it. You seem to think I am your average indoctrinated Christian. I am not. Nothing you said hold any ground over what I know. Sorry.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(December 24, 2015 at 12:23 pm)dyresand Wrote:

(December 24, 2015 at 10:32 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

1. How do you know that any of those documents to be true and or spiritual. 

2. So you don't use interpretations so you are a literalist then? If you are a literalist there
is a lot of information out there that debunks holy documents. 

3. Personal experience is not evidence and is held up to scrutiny for the lack of evidence. If you were to 
see or experience god you are well hallucinating to some sort of degree. God(s) for the lack of the better word
is just all in your head. 

Not at literalist at all. Never said I saw GOD.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(December 24, 2015 at 12:33 pm)Brakeman Wrote:

(December 23, 2015 at 4:28 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: .. He was a man and pure yet subsidiary to the Father or One Creator GOD. Upon resurrection he is no longer man, but spirit. He is the holy spirit, the way, the guide, mercy and the judge among other things.

So do you have conversations with the holy spirit personally? Real conversations, as in he/it actually speaks words to you?

It's more like placing things on my heart rather than having a conversation as if I were talking to a man.

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

(December 24, 2015 at 10:32 am)popsthebuilder Wrote: God of Mr. Hanky,

Does information offend you? I claim absolutely no authority on any one but perhaps my two children to some extent. One must come to their own realizations by God's will. If you don't mind could you let others speak for themselves? I already stated why I was here. What has been shown is utterly unifying and benefitial to all existence so why are you against hearing it? It's ok to refute things that one posits that conflict with known reality, but what I speak of does not. It encompasses literally all we know and what we don't. All I speak of alligns with not only the new covenant, but the Old Testament, Qur'an, book of Enoch, writings of the Bahia, Bahgavad Gita, Exeter book and other ancient philosophical, spiritual writings. I stick to the core writings or scriptures of these faiths, not relying on third party interpretation. I wouldn't ask any to rely on my interpretation. The cool part for me is that all the stuff in scripture is more of verification to something that was shown me about five years ago. It works quite well to solidify what one thinks based on experience into personal fact, irifutable to that individual. I'm here out of a want to make this existence better for following generations, regardless of how few there may be. I am here out of a sense of hope and duty.

Peace

Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

You just stated you have an interest in various holy books, all which are considered unnecessary at best, and disgustingly barbaric at worst by atheists. So, then, again (you misunderstood me the first time) what is your point in pitching it here?

If you have supporting evidence for the veracity of your holy books, the gods to which they are credited, or even thoughts on what makes them still applicable in society (I expect most atheists would say nay, but I won't speak for them), then and only then I would not say you are completely wasting time.

Quote:Faith in selfless Unity for Good.

Find Understanding in Cosmic Knowledge.


(Makes a better acronym!)