RE: Dr. Craig is a liar.
April 11, 2016 at 5:22 pm
(This post was last modified: April 11, 2016 at 5:24 pm by SteveII.
Edit Reason: clarification
)
(April 11, 2016 at 3:05 pm)robvalue Wrote: Even if the logic worked (it doesn't) it is still speculation without any evidence to confirm it.
It relies entirely on the premises being absolutely 100% accurate and exhaustive. "Close enough" and "from what we observe" aren't anywhere near sufficient. Since no method of checking this is built in at any point, we're left with no idea whether the conclusion has any relation to reality or not. WLC is exploring a heavily simplified version of reality in his imagination. That's why stuff like this never returns anything at all useful, ever.
It is nothing but a pat on the back to make believers feel better about what they already believe.
http://youtu.be/inw1fNItjdU
Sufficient for what? These arguments for the existence of God do not return a 100%, ever. That is setting the bar way too high. Arguments where more evidence may not be possible are more appropriately measured "more plausible than its negation".