(June 13, 2016 at 12:12 am)MTL Wrote: *facepalm*That may or may not be true seeing how you provided no source, there are however more guns in the U.S. than automobiles, how the ownership breaks down, who knows?
FAR more people have cars, than guns.
(June 13, 2016 at 12:12 am)MTL Wrote: FAR more people USE cars, than guns, on a DAILY basis.
Not to mention all the other things that are "statistically more likely to kill you" than being present at a mass-shooting.
72,000 small children are seriously injured or killed in lawnmower accidents, in America, every year.
Same reason: a lot more people use lawnmowers, than guns, every day.
But cars and lawnmowers are used for primary purposes very different from the primary purpose a gun is used for.
And by and large, despite the huge number of people injured or killed by cars and lawnmowers,
far, far, far many more people are safely transported by cars, than killed by them, every day,
and far, far many more lawns are safely mown by lawnmowers, every day,
than are children hurt by lawnmowers.
So your logic is to focus on the thing that you're less likely to be affected by statistically?
(June 13, 2016 at 12:12 am)MTL Wrote: I think your own testicles are statistically more likely to kill you with cancer, than a bullet, is.Feminist spotted.
Maybe you should cut them off.