Ooh, good thread...
I don't know. To me, "Life" looks derivative. I fee like I've already seen it. Plus, they seem to have shown a lot of plot points in the trailer. That's never a good sign.
As for "Aftermath," Arnold doesn't have the acting chops to pull off something of that magnitude. The only things he's ever done convincingly are playing a homicidal robot and parodies of himself. I'm not optimistic about that one. (As an interesting side note, I was just on IMDB looking at his page, and it looks like they're making a sequel to the 1988 Devito/Schwarzenegger comedy "Twins" called "Triplets." Fuck me, Hollywood really has run out of ideas.)
One movie that I'm cautiously optimistic about is "A Cure for Wellness." It looks like it has the potential to be an intriguing psychological thriller. It could be shit, though. Gore Verbinski is no Kubrick. At the very least it appears to be visually entertaining.
I don't know. To me, "Life" looks derivative. I fee like I've already seen it. Plus, they seem to have shown a lot of plot points in the trailer. That's never a good sign.
As for "Aftermath," Arnold doesn't have the acting chops to pull off something of that magnitude. The only things he's ever done convincingly are playing a homicidal robot and parodies of himself. I'm not optimistic about that one. (As an interesting side note, I was just on IMDB looking at his page, and it looks like they're making a sequel to the 1988 Devito/Schwarzenegger comedy "Twins" called "Triplets." Fuck me, Hollywood really has run out of ideas.)
One movie that I'm cautiously optimistic about is "A Cure for Wellness." It looks like it has the potential to be an intriguing psychological thriller. It could be shit, though. Gore Verbinski is no Kubrick. At the very least it appears to be visually entertaining.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell