RE: What is logic?
April 18, 2017 at 10:02 am
(This post was last modified: April 18, 2017 at 10:14 am by Angrboda.)
(April 18, 2017 at 7:03 am)Little Rik Wrote:(April 17, 2017 at 11:04 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:
"Lots of souls exist, therefore God!"
The "guru" fails Logic 101.
When the logic is so so simple you find very very hard to understand.
That is a problem with all intellectuals.
They just can not cope with simple things.
Intellectuals like a jungle of ideas so they can get lost in there.
They like getting lost.
In fact their brains is a jungle of madness.
So you're an anti-intellectual in addition to all your other failings. Sour grapes I'd say.
(April 18, 2017 at 7:25 am)Little Rik Wrote: Only someone who knows or pretend to know the truth can judge and because you did judge these people you put yourself in a position to know, that is why i did asked you such a thing.
Well if it's so simple, then you should have no trouble explaining it to us. Sarkar starts out by explaining that material things cannot deliver permanent satisfaction because they're finite, that you need the infinite, i.e. Brahma, to provide permanent satisfaction. He then makes a lot of assertions about atman and the nature of mind, and concludes by saying that the foregoing proves the existence of Brahma, i.e. the infinite. This is nothing less than a proof that permanent satisfaction is possible.
We're in luck, that's exactly what this thread is about! If you could prove that permanent satisfaction is possible, i.e. that Brahma exists, you'd be way ahead in proving the importance of all the rest of the stuff you talk about. So I suggest you prove to us that it is possible, using Sarkar's essay as a guide. If you can't do that, then you're full of shit and you know nothing about Brahma or permanent peace of mind.
So get to proving it! Enough trash talk, let's see some action!