What is logic?

[Angrboda]

It took you a full day to think up that brilliant retort, eh?

Baha!  You don't understand your own guru!  Haha!  Little Rik is Stoopid!

You can't explain his proof, can you?  Well don't worry.  It isn't you.  It's your guru.  His "proof" is full of shit.

But then, you're the idiot who follows him without understanding him.  What a clueless dick you are.

So you reckon that Sarkar said that you can experience the permanent bliss just by lie your shiny bottom
in the lazy chair while eating chips and while sending text messages to your demented friends?
When will you ever wake up and grow up Yog?  

No, I reckon Sarkar said, "In the preceding paragraphs it was established by logic and reasoning that it is only unit consciousness which, under the influence of the different principles of its Prakrti, gradually manifests itself as citta, and as a result of this, mind comes into being. ... This shows that Bhagaván does exist and that It exists as Paramátman or Universal Soul, Bhúmácaetanya or Cosmic Consciousness, or Brahma, the Eternal Blessedness."

He claimed that his essay demonstrated that Brahma exists, not that you can experience it by reading an essay. So your talk about what my shiny bottom can or cannot do is completely irrelevant. What is relevant is whether Sarkar's essay is a sound demonstration that Brahma exists and whether you yourself understand his demonstration. All you've succeeded in doing with your silly taunts is to show that you are as lost as ever. You know nothing and Brahma doesn't exist. So if your meditation is indeed taking you somewhere, it is to a place of no real value. Prove me wrong, Mr. Big Talk. Show that Sarkar's demonstration is sound. Or sit back down and shut up.