(May 20, 2017 at 6:21 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(May 20, 2017 at 2:16 pm)scoobysnack Wrote: To be fair we don't have the evidence, and I need to come out and say that.
You missed my point, which is that by brushing off any potential evidence based solely on who is providing it, you are necessarily practicing selection bias, and that impugns your credibility.
I'm not sure if your misunderstanding is deliberate, or simply based on being beholden to an outlook no matter the facts; but in either case, it doesn't matter to me, because it will have the same end result: you feeding your head with only those things you -- or more appropriately, your sources -- want you(rself) to feed on.
Considering the investigation into how Russia altered the outcome of the US election, this is a key piece that is going to be investigated further. I know the DNC doesn't want this getting out, and really the investigation will be exposing much more than they want the American people to know. All you have to do is start following wikileaks, and not relying on the MSM, as they want to control the story, not give you the information.
The cover up is going to exposed, and then the info will start being investigated. Plus there is a lot of other info out there the MSM isn't even focusing on. They want everyone focused on Russia, and that's it.
