So Minimalist provides this article stating that scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system and that this is a clue as to how life formed and nobody here thought to push back at this at all??? Amazing!!
Maybe the following question would be appropriate:
Given that sugars and methyl isocyanate already exist here on earth and still no scientist that I know of has come up with a natrualistic mechanism for forming life from non-life, how does finding these materials in a distant star system provide any more clues to how life formed than anything that we already know?
Or maybe simply:
Scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system...so what?
Perhaps no atheists wanted to push back as doing so might highlight the lack of any known naturalistic mechanism for forming life from non-life????
C'mon, Minimalist, explain the significance of the finding such that any story whatsoever would be needed from a creationist or anyone else.
Have at it guys!!
Maybe the following question would be appropriate:
Given that sugars and methyl isocyanate already exist here on earth and still no scientist that I know of has come up with a natrualistic mechanism for forming life from non-life, how does finding these materials in a distant star system provide any more clues to how life formed than anything that we already know?
Or maybe simply:
Scientists have found a sugar molecule and methyl isocyanate in a distant star system...so what?
Perhaps no atheists wanted to push back as doing so might highlight the lack of any known naturalistic mechanism for forming life from non-life????
C'mon, Minimalist, explain the significance of the finding such that any story whatsoever would be needed from a creationist or anyone else.
Have at it guys!!