(August 8, 2017 at 3:27 pm)rjh4 is back Wrote:(August 8, 2017 at 2:28 pm)Brian37 Wrote: There never was such a thing as a baby being born without a second set of DNA born with magic super powers and human beings do not survive rigor mortis.
If this is supposed to be some sort of cogent argument against Christianity, it fails miserably. It is merely a statement with no argument in support of it.
It would be like me trying to prove the creationist point of view by saying: There never was life that came from non-life via naturalistic mechanisms.
(August 8, 2017 at 3:20 pm)Brian37 Wrote: The bible is not a science textbook, never has been, never will be. It is an old book of mythology, nothing more.
FYI the word "atheist" is not a worldview. If you want to know what an individual thinks of a certain topic, you have to ask that individual atheist. We are not sheep, we are not a gang, we are not a religion, we are not a political party, we are not an economic view, nor are we a collective "worldview".
I never said that the Bible is a science textbook so I have no idea why you are saying that.
Your statement that it is an old book of mythology is merely opinion and not a cogent argument.
I agree that "atheist" is not a worldview. I was asking any of the individuals to provide answers relative to their personal worldview not some general "atheist" worldview.
Then why the fuck are you trying to say "God could" in reference to atoms and molecular structure? I agree that the bible is not a science textbook, so stop trying to argue REAL science with it.
Your old book of mythology and the fictional head character you call God do not explain in any real measure how atoms and molecules behave under certain conditions and processes. God of the gaps does not work.
Then just ask "Your position is what?" You can drop the word "worldview".
