(August 8, 2017 at 9:20 pm)rjh4 is back Wrote:Quote:Or if god is necessary, why can't they prove god even exists.
Like I said before, I do not think God can be proved in a scientific sense. Nor do I think that His existence can be disproven in a scientific sense. No amount of scientific research or evidence can prove one way or the other. You can say that God is not necessary all you want, too, but that doesn't prove the non-existence of God nor that He is not necessary. That is why I think looking at presuppositions and examining the resulting worldview consistency and rationality provides a better way to look at things.
So...why not proffer your presuppositions and your conclusions and see how they stand up?
You make the claim of god, prove that god exists. Prove that it is necessary. It does not have to be scientifically.
Or have god itself show up. It apparently has a need to be believed in. You apparently have a need for us to believe in it (or you'd not be here). I don't think that an entity with the attributes you profess it has should have any problem with making itself conclusively known, to believers and non believers alike. Why do you think that is? Maybe because it does not exist?
Until god makes itself necessary in some meaningful way, it is not necessary.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.