(August 11, 2017 at 3:12 pm)rjh4 is back Wrote:(August 11, 2017 at 2:27 pm)Brian37 Wrote: GREAT, but you still do not get to cherry pick the parts of evolution you agree with and ignore the rest.
It still remains that a god is not needed to be a starting point. Not Jesus not Allah not Yahweh not Bhrama or Buddhist reincarnation.
Atoms bond automatically as individual atoms without help from fictional puppeteers.
I am sorry that mundane reality isn't romantic and sexy enough for you, but that is your baggage, not mine.
Let me put it to you this way. There is no gravity deity named "Splat" magically pulling you to the ground if you jump off a skyscraper. Atoms don't need a magical force to bond either.
And you clearly do not get how stupid it sounds when you say:
Atoms bond automatically as individual atom then...bata bing bata boom...life.
Imagine sitting in a university freshman chemistry or biology class and an atheist student asking how life came from non-life. Imagine further that the atheist professor said the things you have been saying here. Do you really think the student would be satisfied with that answer? If so, I would not characterize that student as being skeptical of anything. Maybe you are just not very skeptical and believe anything you are told.
Do you think you could create life from non-life in the lab? I challenge you to! I challenge you to find someone who has done it without starting with material already derived from something living. I assure you, if you show that, I will concede the point that it is plausible that life came from non-life in a naturalistic manner and not say that it took a creator.
You, "Mommy mommy, I cant stand that other people are not buying my Sky Hero gap answer."
Boo hoo, like I said, that is your baggage, not mine.
