(August 14, 2017 at 8:46 pm)rjh4 is back Wrote:(August 14, 2017 at 8:37 pm)Succubus Wrote: If you were a creationist and lived prior to the development of modern organic chemistry and you were asked this same question, how would you have replied? Would it be something on the lines of:
"Err, we are not privy to the workings of god's creation". But now that science has presented a possible, solution, you now embrace the scientific explanation! Does this not strike you as being rather opportunistic and dishonest.
How would I have replied? I don't know.
I was asked which way I leaned between two positions. Don't know if that counts a embracing the scientific explanation. But either way, no I do not see that as being rather opportunistic and dishonest. Why would it be either of those things?
Are you a creationist?
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.