RE: 10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer
June 26, 2017 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: June 26, 2017 at 8:56 pm by Astonished.)
(June 26, 2017 at 8:52 pm)Godscreated Wrote:(June 25, 2017 at 4:04 am)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: Abraham was willing to kill Isaac for personal fame and fortune. The story is in contrast to the scene where Satan temps Yeshua by offering him the world if he would worship him. Yeshua declined. Abraham accepted. The story is also based upon the 4th Commandment where Yahweh says that all that opens the womb is his, which means that the parents had to kill their first born or redeem them Abraham was supposedly able to redeem Isaac with a ram that he had caught in a thicket.
Later on in the fairy tale Yahweh said that the dummies should have been samrt enough no to kill the kids but they were idiots so they did.
Suppose you had to kill your son to save your wife. When you got married you took a vow to foresake all others. You never took such a vow for your son. So were you just lying when you pledged to foresake all others for your wife?
You are still ridiculous as you have ever been, if you don't understand the intentions of the marriage vows then you should just leave them out of conversations. You also must have a different version of the Bible than Christians around the world because the one we use says nothing like what you're describing about Abraham. You sir are just throwing around unfounded statements to try and prove a point and all the Christians here understand that weakness in you. You might fool some of the atheist here but I doubt you can foll all of them to many here are smart than that even if they do not want to admit it. I do think it's sad when those who know better than to believe such blatant falsehoods agree with you or others, it's just sad to see people throw away their intellect.
GC
Put your fucking money where your mouth is then, neanderthal. Show that the passage in whatever bible being referenced is either different enough from 'yours' that it can't possibly be interpreted the same way, or that it's not there at all between the surrounding passages, or shut the fuck up. And don't you fucking dare accuse others of throwing away their intellect, jackass. That's clearly not the only thing you've thrown away, honesty and integrity among the lot.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.