RE: 10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer
July 7, 2017 at 9:48 pm
(This post was last modified: July 7, 2017 at 9:49 pm by Cyberman.)
(July 7, 2017 at 9:23 pm)Godscreated Wrote:(July 7, 2017 at 8:55 pm)Cyberman Wrote: Okay, think about what you're saying. You said that there are things God can't/won't do because they displease him. As Inkfeather said, can't and won't are not synonymous and you blew a fuse at that. Which is why I asked the question I did, for clarification.I was giving those who were going to argue the option of calling it can't/won't or whatever. There are things God can't do because it does not please Him and there are things God will do even if they displease Him. There are things God can't do because it is against His nature "who He is." They are not things God has to think about because they are outside His realm of existence. I do not know what else to say to you all on this, I think I've made it quite clear and simple to understand. If I can understand this you geniuses shouldn't have any problem, then again it's not that you want to understand, the fact is you just want to argue instead of learning.
So are you now saying that there are things that God does that displease him?
Ok, GC, wind your neck back in, please; as I said I'm asking these things so we can get some clarity. If you're going to get pissy about your points being clear, maybe you're the wrong person to be making them? Just a thought. (I might even add that maybe a discussion forum isn't the place for you, if discussion upsets you so much...)
Anyway, I digress. I just want to be sure that you understand that "There are things God can't do because it does not please Him" and "there are things God will do even if they displease Him" are not compatible. Or can god do something he cannot do?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'