10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer

[Astonished]

Or that he's not just batshit crazy? Or that the god that revealed this to him isn't something else posing as that?

From his incoherent arguments and terrible spelling, I'm guessing he's a child who's just parroting what his parents tell him without understanding any of it for himself. Or maybe that's just how all religious people are, regardless of age. Either way I'm having a hard time deciphering what he's trying to say 

Here's what I want to know:
1. Why is god okay with one of us, mere lowly humans deserving of eternal hellfire for failing to acknowledge him, being such an arrogant fuck in his name? Surely god wants all credit and glory and yet this egomaniacal twat is hogging quite a bit for themselves with their certainty and superiority complex. Isn't pride a sin?
2. If having this certain, infallible message means GC is burdened with spreading this message of truth to unbelievers and alternative faiths or interpretations of the same faith, why is GC doing such a piss-poor job of it and not trying to use a means of convincing others of the validity of his claims that has been proven effective?
3. If GC is a failure at the above mission, and god chose him for it, isn't GC going to face some consequences for being such a half-assed conversion agent, and isn't god's judgment about both the identities and capabilities of his chosen prophets and his own ability to reveal himself a pretty huge fucking indictment about the entire proposition?