RE: 10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer
July 26, 2017 at 9:34 am
(This post was last modified: July 26, 2017 at 9:38 am by Mister Agenda.)
Godscreated Wrote: I understand the big bang theory as well as most laymen. It's because you have not beginning point to the theory that you keep arguing with distractions.
GC
The theory is based on the evidence that the whole universe was once in a hot, dense state. It works backwards, it would be silly to come up with an idea of how the universe started and then look around for evidence to confirm it.
What's funny is that there isn't a shortage of apologists who claim the Big Bang is evidence of the Bible story of Genesis (the Big Bang is when God said 'let there be light').
Just like it's funny that no one makes the connection that God raising man from the dust is an excellent metaphor for evolving from microorganisms.
Christians can have their scientific cake and eat it too, and millions do.
Harry Nevis Wrote:Just what would evidence of something not existing look like?
It might have contradictory attributes, or be said to have had an effect on the universe that there is evidence against having happened. That takes care of the God of Theodicy and the God of Abraham.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.
