10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer

[Godscreated]

  There is no evidence that the universe was in a dense state, it is an opinion.  God said He created the universe from nothing, meaning He created the materials the universe is made up of. God made the first man's body from the dust of the ground, He made the first woman from Adam's rib and after that God gave humans the means to make human bodies through conception. Evolution has no part of creation.

GC

Why do you suppose cosmologists and physicists proposed and almost universally accepted that the universe was once in a hot dense state without any evidence?

Because they can't accept that God created the universe from nothing. They needed some kinda' story and I guess that's the best they could do.

GC

---

God said He created the universe from nothing, meaning He created the materials the universe is made up of. God made the first man's body from the dust of the ground, He made the first woman from Adam's rib and after that God gave humans the means to make human bodies through conception. Evolution has no part of creation.
GC

Contemporary creationism does not contradict the biblical narrative. At the same time, the biblical narrative does not depend on contemporary creationism and could just as easily accommodate some form of evolution, just not the wildly implausible neo-Darwin synthesis.

Since I take Genesis as literal I can't accept evolution of any kind, now I do believe change within a kind. With the fall came death and some death could have been environmental, and adaptation would have been a must for some kinds to survive. the same would apply for the post flood era. People say including most scientist that when a donkey and horse mate the offspring is sterile, not so in some cases. It has been documented that a mule mating with a donkey has produce offspring. I have been wondering what to call it a mulkey or a donule.

GC