RE: 10 Questions Biblical Literalists Cannot Honestly Answer
August 2, 2017 at 1:07 am
(This post was last modified: August 2, 2017 at 1:13 am by Godscreated.)
[quote='Khemikal' pid='1595463' dateline='1501603999']
[quote='Godscreated' pid='1595281' dateline='1501555096']
Evolutionary scientist and their followers make the claim of wholes sale change, if not then micro-organisms would be all that roamed the muddy pools of this planet.
[/quote]
They refer to speciation events, which is simply when one population becomes incapable of successfully interbreeding with another.
[/quote]
Avoidance is unbecoming even for you.
[quote]
you must have read my post wrong because I said it's been documented that on occasion mules will have an offspring if breed with a donkey. The result is not a new kind it's still of the horse family and always will be.
[/quote]
[quote='Khemikal']
-as all speciated populations will -still- be "of the same kind" as their parent populations. You're still an ape.
[/quote]
Not hardly sonny boy. If being an ape is what you want for yourself then have at it and go swing in the trees, but for me and my kind will live as God intended, humans.
[quote=Khemikal}
Horses and donkeys are both different species, differing chromosomes - this is precisely why their offspring are infertile, you see, but they share a "kind" (equidae). Mules are F1 hybrids produced by selection, same as literally everything you eat that grows out of the ground. The "on occasion" isn't a mystery either, it's when any given mule possesses chromosomal compatibility with a donkey. The disparity between them is precisely one fewer than with horses. So, it's a longshot, but less so than 64/62. It's also why a successful human chimp hybrid is unlikely to impossible, despite being "the same kind" - human beings having 46 (23 base pairs) and chimps have 48 (24). We have a fused telomere pair at chromosome 2 corresponding to chromosomes in other apes. It's doubled up, and we call it...wait for it...."the human chromosome".
Still accepting modern synth, you just don't know what it is or what it says. It's not as if you could reject it if you tried...it's just another strange thing you believe, in this case, about yourself. Genetics isn't the sort of thing that one gets to argue. It's demonstrable, as is selection. As is change over time..within and without "kinds".[/quote]
Then if speciation is limited how does evolution explain from the mud puddle to mammals. There offspring on occasion is not infertile and presumably if man were to take an interest in making the mule fertile we could. This of coarse would be a guided change by a superior being.
GC
[quote='Godscreated' pid='1595281' dateline='1501555096']
Evolutionary scientist and their followers make the claim of wholes sale change, if not then micro-organisms would be all that roamed the muddy pools of this planet.
[/quote]
They refer to speciation events, which is simply when one population becomes incapable of successfully interbreeding with another.
[/quote]
Avoidance is unbecoming even for you.
[quote]
you must have read my post wrong because I said it's been documented that on occasion mules will have an offspring if breed with a donkey. The result is not a new kind it's still of the horse family and always will be.
[/quote]
[quote='Khemikal']
-as all speciated populations will -still- be "of the same kind" as their parent populations. You're still an ape.
[/quote]
Not hardly sonny boy. If being an ape is what you want for yourself then have at it and go swing in the trees, but for me and my kind will live as God intended, humans.
[quote=Khemikal}
Horses and donkeys are both different species, differing chromosomes - this is precisely why their offspring are infertile, you see, but they share a "kind" (equidae). Mules are F1 hybrids produced by selection, same as literally everything you eat that grows out of the ground. The "on occasion" isn't a mystery either, it's when any given mule possesses chromosomal compatibility with a donkey. The disparity between them is precisely one fewer than with horses. So, it's a longshot, but less so than 64/62. It's also why a successful human chimp hybrid is unlikely to impossible, despite being "the same kind" - human beings having 46 (23 base pairs) and chimps have 48 (24). We have a fused telomere pair at chromosome 2 corresponding to chromosomes in other apes. It's doubled up, and we call it...wait for it...."the human chromosome".
Still accepting modern synth, you just don't know what it is or what it says. It's not as if you could reject it if you tried...it's just another strange thing you believe, in this case, about yourself. Genetics isn't the sort of thing that one gets to argue. It's demonstrable, as is selection. As is change over time..within and without "kinds".[/quote]
Then if speciation is limited how does evolution explain from the mud puddle to mammals. There offspring on occasion is not infertile and presumably if man were to take an interest in making the mule fertile we could. This of coarse would be a guided change by a superior being.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
