Objective morality as a proper basic belief

[The Grand Nudger]

It's also a fact that most of us have decided that rape is bad enough to have cops kill you if you don't surrender, and if you subjectively don't agree with that assessment, it won't keep you out of jail. I think there are objectively better and worse ways to run a society, and one that let's rapists do as they will is worse than one that constrains them, all other things being equal. I think that the good of society overrides the freedom of the rapist. But we have to agree that society is better off with rape being illegal to agree on this. I think it's the natural conclusion for anyone who is empathetic and can see how such a society is in their own best interests; but if we don't share that, you're going to reach a different conclusion. That's the subjective part.

That's the direction that objective moral theorists go, as well.  They contend that there are moral facts of the matter - that the moral schema itself is rooted in objectivity...but that our moral agency is subjective.. our moral competency compromised.

@Henry.

I don't see what a god adds to the discussion of objective morality, it's certainly not a requirement. Often enough, it seems as though god belief is a major impediment to objective morality, and to people acting in accordance with an objectively grounded moral schema. To people doing what gods will, rather than what is right.

God belief is, at least, one way to get a good man to do a bad thing. It seems to be a part of our subjective agency, a direct source of moral incompetence.