(February 2, 2020 at 4:41 pm)Mr Greene Wrote: So you're now claiming that the nationalized infrastructure under Network Rail is 'good' as opposed to 'failing' as you claimed on page 210?
Make your mind up love.
I work for the British civil service where our IT was outsourced.
We went from nipping next door to "Jez" for any It issues, to having to contact a central IT support centre where our IT requests were sent to another agency who squirreled it out to various agencies which would eventually carry out work, each task with a cost.
If we wanted to move a computer we had to save up, we could only order in batches of 10 which cost £1000 each time. This on top of paying in excess of £300 a month per person that used a computer i.e. all the staff, in my site we had well over 300 people.
Jez earned 30000 pounds a year and would fix most issues that day.
The rail network in my area is privatised, gives a famously poor service and costs a larger percentage of GDP to subsidise that when it was nationally owned.
The buses are very expensive now they've been privatised and we have multiple bus companies on the same route so you have to often wait for the right bus to come even though the one that just went past goes right by your house.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.