(July 15, 2020 at 6:32 pm)ModusPonens1 Wrote:They sure as hell are terrible to everyone who gets hurt due to there lack of control .Weather they are morally comparable for the action.(July 15, 2020 at 6:30 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Oh no some people have little ego at all .But a terrible in their unique ways .
How can a person without an ego be terrible? Doesn't a person without an ego do terrible actions but have no terrible character?
For example, isn't a person who has no ego who kills somebody more like a rabid dog than a devil?
Doesn't no ego mean no conscience and doesn't no conscience mean amoral rather than immoral? Despite immoral actions.
A rabid dog may not be malevolent but it's certainly can be destructive
A non conscience harm is still a harm
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM