RE: The Official "Damned Trump" Thread
March 3, 2021 at 4:23 pm
(This post was last modified: March 3, 2021 at 4:24 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(March 3, 2021 at 1:35 am)Angrboda Wrote:1. Are you suggesting Tea Partiers would have voted democrat if they had not run Hilary as a candidate? That seems unlikely.(March 3, 2021 at 1:33 am)SUNGULA Wrote: For groups like the Tea partiers, Trump was a natural extension whether Hilary ran or not.
That's nice. Now all you need is evidence.
2. So far your evidence is "statistics say so " according to you .....Not very compelling I'm afraid
(March 3, 2021 at 12:21 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote:A lot of truth here(March 2, 2021 at 12:43 pm)Angrboda Wrote: The statistics say otherwise. The middle hated Trump, but they hated Hillary more, and that swung key states and districts.
Didn't swing shit. She won the pop vote in a landslide. In fact, she won it by a historic margin that would only be eclipsed by the next democrat candidates even more historic margin.
It's almost as if they were pissed about democracy not working, or something. The left hates trumpism because it rubs against their values. The middle hates trumpism because it says the quiet parts (that they agree with!) out loud....the far right bows at the altar of their new god.
Good luck to all of em. Especially the far right, they're gonna need it.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM