RE: The Official "Damned Trump" Thread
March 4, 2021 at 1:59 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2021 at 2:07 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
(March 4, 2021 at 1:22 am)Angrboda Wrote:1. Wheater you were asked or not you made a claim that you didn't back with evidence. Thus the standard claims should be backed up with evidence was not been met.(March 4, 2021 at 12:42 am)SUNGULA Wrote: I was pointing out you didn't provide evidence for this claim. Then you demand evidence from me. (though it turns out your right)
I'm sorry, could you link me to where I was asked to provide evidence? If I overlooked it, I most certainly will apologize for my failure to address it.
(March 4, 2021 at 12:42 am)SUNGULA Wrote: Nothing because it's not an accusation.
You suggested that I would never live up to my own standard. That would be a silly thing to say if I had already met my standard, so obviously you were accusing me of not having done so. So what standard of mine is it that you were accusing me of not having lived up to?
2. I said in this instance you made a claim you didn't back it while asking i back up a claim. And it wasn't an accusation that has a specific moral implication. I was simply pointing out what I feel is an inconsistency without inferring any duplicity or malice behind it.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM