RE: The Official "Damned Trump" Thread
March 4, 2021 at 2:38 am
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2021 at 2:43 am by Angrboda.)
(March 4, 2021 at 1:59 am)SUNGULA Wrote:(March 4, 2021 at 1:22 am)Angrboda Wrote: I'm sorry, could you link me to where I was asked to provide evidence? If I overlooked it, I most certainly will apologize for my failure to address it.1. Wheater you were asked or not you made a claim that you didn't back with evidence. Thus the standard claims should be backed up with evidence was not been met.
You suggested that I would never live up to my own standard. That would be a silly thing to say if I had already met my standard, so obviously you were accusing me of not having done so. So what standard of mine is it that you were accusing me of not having lived up to?
I have no standard that people should provide evidence they haven't been asked for, so your claim is a bunch of shit. I have no standard that people must supply evidence. You're a lying cunt.
(March 4, 2021 at 1:59 am)SUNGULA Wrote: 2. I said in this instance you made a claim you didn't back it while asking i back up a claim. And it wasn't an accusation that has a specific moral implication. I was simply pointing out what I feel is an inconsistency without inferring any duplicity or malice behind it.
I have no obligation to provide anything, nor do I demand that anyone provide something I haven't asked for. Cut the shit, asshole. There was no inconsistency. Now you're just telling a bunch of lies. Whether you acknowledge that you meant to make a moral implication, accusing someone of inconsistently applying their standards in the way you suggest is hypocrisy, the claim of which has very definite moral implications, so that's another lie.