RE: The Official "Damned Trump" Thread
March 4, 2021 at 7:57 pm
(This post was last modified: March 4, 2021 at 8:30 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
First, I didn't abandon shit nor did I tell a single fucking lie. I ended this conversation because there was fuck all left to say and even after your waffling response there still isn't.
Quote:I never did any such thing. You're just telling lie after lie after lie. I could have refused to provide evidence or I could have provided it. You'll never know because you never asked.Yes, you fucking did and no I have not told a single fucking lie in this whole thread. The fact is you made an unsubstantiated claim then berated me for doing the same thing. The fact no one asked is irrelevant to that fact.
Quote:You're right, I didn't ask myself for evidence, because that would be stupid. I asked you for evidence and nobody asked me for evidence, which is inconsistent, but I don't control others asking or not asking.The fact is you made an unsubstantiated claim then berated me for doing the same thing. The fact no one asked is irrelevant to that fact.
Quote:You keep conflating asking with providing. There is a difference between the providing because there was a difference in the asking. That's as it should be. As a practical matter, the evidence one could provide for any claim could be limitless. I might be asked to provide statistics and end up being pressed for a treatise on Fisher's groundbreaking work on statistics to back up my interpretation, and then the theory of measurement to back up Fisher and so on until doomsday. What stops that is the requirement of the person who is skeptical and what their level of satisfaction requires. And that's indicated by their asking or not asking for more.It's not a conflation you made a claim that you didn't substantiate with evidence then you rode my ass for doing the same thing. If you were consistent you could have simply cited a source for the statistics. It's not fucking complicated people do it on this forum all the time without being asked. So this just like a bunch of epistemic waffling.
Quote:Nothing about intent. You claimed I had a standard and that I wasn't meeting it. That's hypocrisy. It would be worse if it were intentional hypocrisy, but it needn't be.I'll grant you intent was a mistake (you hypocritical without it being intentional) but nope I accused of inconsistency, not hypocrisy those are not the same thing. Not all inconsistency is hypocrisy.
Quote:Yes, I fully understand why you're abandoning this discussion, too. You're reduced to telling lies about even the meaning of words!I have not told a single lie. I did misuse a word but that was a mistake but I didn't lie. So ends this pointless dick measuring contest.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM