(July 28, 2017 at 1:18 am)Godscreated Wrote:(July 27, 2017 at 9:36 am)Inkfeather132 Wrote: I already showed you how that "argument" isn't logical. Paul judges all women based on Eve's behavior, which is not how the world works. I don't judge all men based on Noah, or all black people based on Martin Luther King, Jr. It's stupid because there is diversity in large groups. Not all women would have eaten the fruit, not all men would have just done what their wife told them without questioning. Paul's argument was incorrect and you are the one ignoring that.
I've ignored nothing, Paul was relating to women through God's judgement and that's why he made the statement he did. Your view is a secular view on this subject and it has no place in the teaching of spiritual matters. Diversity has nothing to do with understanding God's word because ultimately one can't understand the truths without the guidance of the Holy Spirit. There were not a bunch of women nor men at that particular time so your thinking is irrelevant, and yes everyone would have fallen to that temptation. Why, because those two knew God through experiencing His presence, same goes for Moses and they failed.
GC
Thank you for proving once and for all that faith and reason are absolutely irrevocably irreconcilable. You will never say or do anything useful again.
Religions were invented to impress and dupe illiterate, superstitious stone-age peasants. So in this modern, enlightened age of information, what's your excuse? Or are you saying with all your advantages, you were still tricked as easily as those early humans?
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.
---
There is no better way to convey the least amount of information in the greatest amount of words than to try explaining your religious views.