RE: Evidence to Convict?
August 2, 2017 at 6:03 am
(This post was last modified: August 2, 2017 at 6:06 am by Cyberman.)
Wouldn't there be, for example, bloodstains on the chair matching the victim's? Splinters of wood or whatever in the wound matching damage to the chair? Silly physical stuff like that?
Quite apart from that, those dozen witnesses are in one room at the same time giving broadly the same account; which is completely different to any of the gospel characters who are anonymous, appear nowhere else in any record and contradict on important details, while the gospels themselves were written over a protracted period and many years after the alleged fact. Again, one of these things is not like the others.
Quite apart from that, those dozen witnesses are in one room at the same time giving broadly the same account; which is completely different to any of the gospel characters who are anonymous, appear nowhere else in any record and contradict on important details, while the gospels themselves were written over a protracted period and many years after the alleged fact. Again, one of these things is not like the others.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
