(October 5, 2017 at 2:21 pm)Brian37 Wrote: Hey Drippy,
THE END RESULT was still ACCESS and because of his ACCESS 59 people are dead and thousands injured and those whom survived will need psychiatric care for PTSD.
if you agree he was disturbed, and disturbed people should not have firearms then you cant bitch about the sane who actually want to PREVENT such events in the future.
Otherwise all I am seeing from you is arguing to protect an object.
And because little timmy mcvey had access to diesel fuel and fertlizer he kill 3x more people wounded almost 2x as many and destroyed 700 million dollar more because he has ACCESS TO DIESEL Fuel
Does it ease you little liberal mind that hose people were blown apart rather than shot down?
I don't get how you people think.. the problem is not the tool it is the nut bag who has the hammer in his hand that is the propblem not the hammer.. the hammer is just a tool it can be used to build or it can be used to tear down it s all on who uses the hammer.
Does that mean we bann diesel fuel because some nut job can make a bomb from it? to we even ban that particular fertilizer? no (we put regulations on it just like a gun, meaning we record whom ever buys it in quantity) you can get it at amazon.com
https://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywor...alt1wgap_b
That and 20 dollars worth of diesel and you could kill as many if not more. for far less money and remotly. that is why terrorists use bombs...
We are still new at this whole terror thing. once the douches in the trucks and the guys spraying crowds meet armed citizens then they will start blowing themselves up.
You are not fixing anything by taking away guns the Harvard study I left on your thread shows that conclusively. the problem is people. Not all are good like your world view demands. access to guns is an infants expression in terror. once force it met with force the real terrorists will show up straped to a bomb.
Then will that make you feel better? people dying due to explosion rather than bullet wound?
