(December 8, 2017 at 11:15 am)Drich Wrote: ...When you ask a question based on a specific cannon, then you for the sake of the argument at least suspend the right to call into question the validity of the cannon. Why? because you question asks for cannon to explain itself. when it does to back out of the question is intellectual dishonesty...
Who wrote the cannon gospels?
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.