(December 30, 2017 at 9:08 pm)Thena323 Wrote:(December 30, 2017 at 7:24 pm)SaStrike Wrote: but those are just old blog pages from two random women. right?
anyway lets assume that they are not biased and just go with it;
in the second link you posted, what i understand from what is being conveyed, is that when a married couple divorces, and ONLY when the woman works more hours than the man, the child custody win rate is around 50-50
that doesnt mean there is no gender biased in court against men regarding child custody? what a misleading article title. dishonest writing imo...
The Times piece wasn't a feminist rant; it was referencing a series of articles for Working Mother Magazine, warning that readers who held the misperception of there being a gender-bias being in their favor would undoubtedly be dealt a blow of shock and devastation in the courtroom.
Because again, the court bias appears to be in the presumption, that the parent who works more, parents less. Male OR female.
I'm not suggesting that gender bias against men never, ever occurs in regards to custody proceedings. But I seriously question the MRM claim of gender bias being widespread and prevalent to the point of the system being rigged against them in regards to custody, when they can only produce the fervent assertion of everyone knows this... and anecdotal accounts that can't be corroborated or verified. If there's better evidence, where is it?
Because again, if anyone has any reliable/statistical data that supports the claim, I'd be interested in seeing it.
i agree with you 100%
but i just find it strange she was able to find the set of data she was looking, you know, that 50-50 equality split. and for the other (more important and easier to find data, the actual numbers of all included cases) hasnt been mentioned and seems to be missing from the public.
as you can tell by my lack of grammar im on mobile at the moment so im unable to search.
