The benefits of being christian. Where are there???

[drfuzzy]

What Jack said.  This is a forum.  I was under the impression that any member can jump in.
I do find your offensive tactics, illiterate posts, sociopathic ego, judgmental hateful fantasies, and profound pride in your willful ignorance repulsive.  
Of course, you're the BEST example here for why a person would never want to be a xtian, so you're a great data source.  Keep it up.
But every once in a while I see something monumentally DripShitFull in a quote and respond.  So exactly what sort of victimization are you threatening me with, DripShit? 
What is an illiterate asshole going to use to threaten someone with two Master's Degrees and a Doctorate?  Your psychotic visions, made up stories (lies), and book of fairy tales?
Your assertion that your imaginary friend talks to you?  Tell you what, you pray your little itty bitty hateful heart out, and when your gawd proves that it isn't a fantasy, 
we'll get back to that.

Oh, and the quote "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is from St. Ambrose.  Not Paul.

But how stupid are you (or anyone else in an "OPEN FORUM" to jump in and take what was said about a specific person time and place and apply it to your life?

Don't you understand when I say I comment was not addressed to you, means my comment wasn't an attempt to describe a universal condition, but to speak on an indivisual's situation?

Is it wrong then to point that out?

or are you foolishing saying I should argue the affirmative position concerning my comments on another person, to apply an indivisual that was not the intended target?


Example: Trich likes brownies

Dr. Fuzz: How can you say I like brownies you don't know me.

Again wtf am I supposed to say other than I am not speaking about you moron!

Or because it is an open forum am I supposed to take what I said about one member and argue the fact that I know everyone enough to know where you specifically like brownies!


The problem: you guys don't care what I say, you will argue the oppsite.

That's an interesting derailment.  Grandizer and Abaddon didn't yell at me for taking a few statements out of your "private" little argument.  You yell when we make general "us" atheist statements, you pitch a tantrum when I make a personal observation.  

So, you were "in discourse" with Grandizer, trying to slime him by claiming that he wasn't much of a bible reader.  (snort) You ended with "Now how else would a proud atheist react when I tell them all of what they know of God is wrong? Will they be happy for the correction?"

This is a blanket statement that applies to every atheist, and could reasonably be answered by anyone on this forum.  The statement also shows your typical ignorant arrogance.  

Abaddon wrote something that people here have told you hundreds of times.  "I didn't acknowledge god. I merely tested your claim to be able to ask god direct questions and receive answers from him/her/it/housecat. You failed miserably. As did your "god"."  This is something so common here that it's amazing that you clearly were incapable of comprehending it.  
Abaddon asked for proof, you were incapable, as usual, of providing proof.  Your response was typical gibberish claiming victory because you seem to think that we should believe your fantasies.  Quoting Abaddon was simply providing support of his position.

All you do is hurl childish playground insults and insult people's intelligence when they disagree with something you posted.  You claim to have proof, you constantly provide none.  You told Jor that all of your claims come from vetted sources, and you never provide a single one. I supported the positions of fellow forum members and you throw a tantrum worthy of a 6-year old about . . . brownies?? . . . using 6-year-old logic, grammar, and spelling. 

We ask for proof that your imaginary friend exists, and we get the typical infantile temper tantrum.  Boo-hoo.  Go run home to mommy.