(January 22, 2018 at 9:49 am)vulcanlogician Wrote:(January 22, 2018 at 9:35 am)MysticKnight Wrote: I can easily show you went wrong and have a false analogy.
How about I give you a chance or Atheists a chance to correct you.
It may help you to reason to arrive at what reason calls. (hint: look at premise 1).
Even with premise 1, it does not follow. I intentionally left out premise 1 because it's really vague, and I just wanted to see what work premise 2 and 3 did ON THEIR OWN. Even if premise 1 is true-- truer than true, it does not change anything.
2 and 3 don't prove the conclusion. With 1, and given that the nature of goodness is stemming from God's breath and is a hue of his life and brought down light in degrees, and water that causes his plants to grow, it is proven. And 1 is saying there is but one possible nature to goodness and since we know a mystic spiritual light nature is a possibility, it is the reality.