(January 23, 2018 at 2:24 pm)Khemikal Wrote: When someone can find a politician that -doesn't- want a contract to build a part of the next fighter for their state is the time to talk about a "strong military" like it were a difference between r's and d's.
Until then, it;s very obviously one of those reasons™ that have been used to con people into pulling the lever against their own interests.
The same observation can be made in the reverse....that a person who votes d because they want to see military spending decreased. Well, maybe d's should make that more clear to their reps....because dems keep signin that check, don't they?
I mostly agree. The shittiness there tends to be fairly bipartisan.
